Poincaré, Sartre, Continuity, and Temporality
Titre :
Poincaré, Sartre, Continuity, and TemporalitySujet :
PhilosophieDescription :
In this paper, I examine the relation between Henri Poincaré’s definition of mathematical continuity and Sartre’s discussion of temporality in Being and Nothingness. Poincaré states that a series A, B, and C is continuous when A=B, B=C and A is less than C. I explicate Poincaré’s definition and examine the arguments that he uses to arrive at this definition. I argue that Poincaré’s definition is applicable to temporal series, and I show that this definition of continuity provides a logical basis for Sartre’s psychological explanation of temporality. Specifically, I demonstrate that Poincaré’s definition allows the for-itself to be understood both as connected to a past and future and as distinct from itself. I conclude that the gap between two terms in a temporal series comprises the present and being-for-itself, since it is this gap that occasions the radical freedom to reshape the past into a distinct and different future.Créateur :
Gingerich, JonathanSource :
Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 37, No. 3, October 2006Date :
2006-10Relation :
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1712947Format :
application/pdfLangue :
enType :
Article de revue ; TexteDescription
In this paper, I examine the relation between Henri Poincaré’s definition of mathematical continuity and Sartre’s discussion of temporality in Being and Nothingness. Poincaré states that a series A, B, and C is continuous when A=B, B=C and A is less than C. I explicate Poincaré’s definition and examine the arguments that he uses to arrive at this definition. I argue that Poincaré’s definition is applicable to temporal series, and I show that this definition of continuity provides a logical basis for Sartre’s psychological explanation of temporality. Specifically, I demonstrate that Poincaré’s definition allows the for-itself to be understood both as connected to a past and future and as distinct from itself. I conclude that the gap between two terms in a temporal series comprises the present and being-for-itself, since it is this gap that occasions the radical freedom to reshape the past into a distinct and different future.Auteur
Gingerich, JonathanDate
2006-10Source
Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 37, No. 3, October 2006Item Relations
This item has no relations.